Search for:
  • Home/
  • Kit Car/
  • The Walna Scar Street – To Travel Or Not to Drive
The Walna Scar Street – To Travel Or Not to Drive

The Walna Scar Street – To Travel Or Not to Drive

Recently on my return from an outing in the Coniston Fells I chanced upon a reporter and cameraman from ITV News filming on the reduced element of the Walna Scar Road. Walna Scar would not on the experience of it seem the most newsworthy spot or even the most attention-grabbing to movie though it transpired that the reason for their existence was the fact that the street experienced just that really morning been closed to motorised site visitors.

I had been under the perception that this highway was only open up to walkers, cyclists and horse riders but this – until that morning – was not the case. In fact there have been many court docket disputes to establish the position of Walna Scar and comparable steps are in development more than the Garburn Move in the japanese Lakes.

On the experience of it you may question who would want to generate above tracks these kinds of as these as undertaking so would undoubtedly problems the ordinary auto with no promise of producing it around to the significantly facet. It would seem however that organizations presenting off street driving activities are the most important opponents to visitors totally free standing and I can see their facet of the argument – they will need someplace to be able to supply their companies as do these who supply off street motor biking and quad biking journeys.

This provides us into a discussion comparable to that in excess of the 10 knot velocity restrict imposed on Windermere in 2005 which proficiently banished the energy boats and h2o skiers from the lake. They were not banned as this sort of but 10 knots (a lot less than 12 mph) is inadequate speed to h2o ski or have any variety of enjoyable in a power boat so they went elsewhere. The ban was unpopular amid watersports enthusiasts but at the end of the day some of their actions have been a threat to other lake consumers.

My particular view in favour of the ban is based mostly on the truth that if I stroll or ride my bike up this monitor I am neither endangering other end users, triggering distress to livestock or wildlife or inflicting an undue amount of money of injury to the keep track of itself. As quickly as one particular drives a motor automobile up here however this would not be the situation. Quite aside from the actual physical hazard to other people there is the factor of sounds to take into consideration. Our key streets and cities are plagued by visitors sounds and pollution and We occur to locations such as the Lakeland Fells to escape this sort of matters as the roaring of engines.

I do not pretend to have an reply that will keep anyone happy right here which is why the circumstance is likely by means of the courts but the Forestry Commission run a very good program on their forest roads. The routes are closed to personal motor site visitors but are open up for use by walkers, cyclists and – as considerably as I know – horse riders but the Forestry Commission’s have logging vehicles use the roads for entry to timber and other end users will have to give way to them if encountered. In the circumstance of Walna Scar and other contended routes I would recommend a very similar arrangement whereby farmers and the crisis expert services can use the street – in addition to quarry autos in the scenario of Walna Scar – but with the routes remaining shut to private motor targeted visitors.

I may well not agree with the motorised buyers in this article but I have at least outlined their stage of look at. For the lawful arguments which I will not attempt to describe I have put a backlink at the finish of this post to GLEAM who are a strain group who marketing campaign by the lawful process to continue to keep motor autos off our eco-friendly lanes and byways so preserving them as a safe place for walkers, cyclists and horse riders.